Mapping and testing a B2B value proposition in a leaner way

B2B value proposition case cover

Situation

The building materials ecosystem included a marketplace, a loyalty program for industries and stores, and another loyalty program for construction professionals. While these products aimed to provide value, there was internal recognition of a major gap: unclear understanding of what was truly being offered versus what industries valued. This misalignment limited the ecosystem’s ability to deliver meaningful client value.

Task

I was responsible for leading a research initiative for the Squad Industries team. The goals were:

  • Map industries’ pain points, tasks, and goals within the ecosystem.
  • Identify gaps in products and services versus client needs.
  • Propose strategies to connect and improve the value delivered across the ecosystem.
  • Build a foundation for aligning offerings with client priorities.

Action

I designed and executed a structured, lean research process:

  • Research:
    • Conducted interviews with strategic representatives from each product to map industries’ needs.
    • Curated insights with support from a Business Coordinator and an ex-industry collaborator
    • Applied Osterwalder’s framework to evaluate offerings (offered/partially offered/not offered vs. attended/partially attended/not attended).

 

  • Ideation:
    • Identified gaps where products and services fell short of meeting client expectations.
    • Proposed creating a consultancy team to address gaps, act as an MVP concierge, and gather deeper insights.
    • Interpreted results as hypotheses for further validation with industry stakeholders.

Result

The research uncovered important insights:

  • Gaps in offerings: revealed weaknesses alongside existing strengths across the ecosystem.
  • Documented industry pain points and unmet needs, forming a foundation for improvements.
  • Improved clarity on value connections between products, showing how offerings could work together.

 

Although limited by reliance on internal perspectives, treating the results as hypotheses and planning a consultancy team mitigated risks.

Reflection and learnings

  • Internal research can provide valuable hypotheses when conducted with structured frameworks.
  • Balancing lean timelines with depth of insight is challenging but achievable with strategic focus.
  • A consultancy team can both bridge value gaps and serve as a testing ground for innovations.
  • Adapting Osterwalder’s methodology helped deliver actionable results under time constraints.

Future opportunities

  • Validate hypotheses directly with industry stakeholders.
  • Expand and strengthen the consultancy team’s role in ongoing monitoring and testing.
  • Enhance product integration to deliver seamless, ecosystem-wide value.
  • Use customer validation to refine strategies and align more closely with real industry needs.